The National Democratic Alliance-ruled states will press
for expediting the borrowing process for states that
have picked either of the two options presented by the
Centre to make up for the compensation-cess shortfall.
Meanwhile, Puducherry Chief Minister (CM) V Narayanasamy
said that it was in favour of the GST Council resolving
the issue at the earliest. “Everything depends on the
discussions that take place. Every political party wants
to resolve the issue and not defer it further.” He said
it is the statutory obligation on the part of the Union
government to borrow and give money to states.
“That’s what the former FM (late Arun Jaitley)
categorically stated when he chaired the meeting. The
Centre should not go back on that commitment,” said
Narayanasamy.
The meeting on October 5 had remained inconclusive and
discussion was deferred to October 12.
Assam FM Himanta Biswa Sarma pointed out that there
should be voting on the issue. “In the spirit of
democracy, voting can take place to resolve the issue,”
he said. He added that the matter should not be delayed
further. “Let other states pursue their course. Whether
going to SC, the dispute resolution mechanism or voting
— we have no opposition. We will not get in their way,
they should not get in ours,” he added.
However, sources in the Centre had indicated that the
issue of borrowing does not fall within the ambit of the
GST Council. Hence, there can be no voting on the
subject.
Chhattisgarh FM T S Singh Deo, however, resisted this
idea, saying if the borrowing was not under the purview
of the GST Council, it should not even have been brought
to the Council in the first place.
He added that while it would want consensus on the
issue, voting will be the last resort. He also said he
was open to the idea of getting the issue resolved
through a Group of Ministers (GoM).
“While moving SC on the issue is acceptable, a GST
Council GoM can also look at the issue and give
recommendations within a few days. It is also a dispute
resolution mechanism,” he added.
Bihar Deputy CM Sushil Kumar Modi emphasised that the
states that have picked the option of the RBI window
should be allowed to go with it, while others can keep
deliberating on it.
“It should not be a matter for the GST Council to decide
which states will opt for it or which ones won’t,” said
Modi, adding that a GoM can look into the dispute raised
by the dissenting states.
The Union finance ministry has offered two solutions to
states — borrow Rs 97,000 crore, which is the result of
the shortfall owing to GST implementation through the
special window facilitated by the RBI, or borrow the
full shortfall in compensation (Rs 2.35 trillion), which
includes the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, from the
markets, to be facilitated by the central bank.
The amounts will be paid by the compensation cess, which
will extend beyond June 30, 2022. In the case of the
second option, the proposed extension of cess will be
used for paying only the principal, not the interest.
The option of the special window was raised to Rs 1.1
trillion at the October 5 meeting.
According to government sources, at least 21 states and
Union Territories that had agreed to the Centre’s
options are Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam,
Bihar, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu &
Kashmir, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya,
Mizoram, Nagaland, Odisha, Puducherry, Sikkim, Tripura,
Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.
The Centre needs the support of 20 states to pass a
resolution in the GST Council in case voting is
required.
Source::: Business Standard, dated 12/10/2020